
In
1996 the maternal death rate in CA was
5.6 per 100,000.
In
2006 it's
16.9.
That's a huge increase. It's a scary increase actually. One article I read said
"it’s more dangerous to give birth in California than it is in Kuwait or Bosnia"
I still get so fired up at the wrongness of hospitals pushing C-sections and inductions on patients that simply don't have any indications that anything is wrong. Dilating at 1 cm an hour, as is the currently accepted rate of progress of a hospital delivery, is ridiculous. If that rate had been applied to me, I would have had a c-section too. (I had a very normal first time birth of 20 hours.)
Although having a c-section with your first birth is slightly more dangerous than giving birth naturally (assuming you don't have any reasons to be categorized as higher risk).
It's the following births that are much more dangerous. For one, many hospitals won't even let you have a natural birth after having a c-section - so that's more surgery whether you need it/want it, or not.
The main issue is that you will have scars from the previous c-sections. If you're unlucky enough to have the placenta on those scars, your body can't cap off the placenta after the child is born and you can bleed to death. Imagine having many c-sections. Your chances of having the placenta on those scars just get higher and higher.
Here's
some good articles about this newly issued report that is showing that
the maternal death rate is drastically on the rise here in good 'ole CA. (And here's the
chart.)
I wish I could get this data for the Bay Area Counties.